Re-militarization of Rhineland
Contributor: C. Peter Chen
ww2dbaseAfter WW1, in order to place a buffer between Germany and themselves, France and the Low Countries dictated that Rhineland was to be a demilitarized zone. Within Rhineland were many of Germany's greatest cities, Cologne, Aachen, Frankfurt, and Düsseldorf; it was not only a collection of beautiful vineyards, but it was also Germany's industrial center. In 1925, Germany was entered into the Locarno Pact with France, Britain, Belgium, and Italy to extend the demilitarization clause of the Versailles Treaty into the foreseeable future. As late as Mar 1935, Adolf Hitler publicly claimed that a demilitarized Rhineland was Germany's contribution of peace; however, he already had the plans to violate the Locarno Pact. On 21 Oct 1935, French intelligence detected Germany troop movements east of the Rhine, and immediately informed Britain. But deep in appeasement mentality, nothing was heard from Britain. The French government was as unresponsive as their British counterparts.
ww2dbaseOn Saturday, 7 Mar 1936, German troops crossed the Rhine. Hitler chose that date knowing that British Ministers of Parliament would be unavailable on that day; the British ruling class was accustomed "to take its weekends in the country," criticized Winston Churchill, while "Hitler takes his countries in the weekends." Messerschmitt fighters first flew over the river in tight formation as scouts, then the infantry crossed the bridges soon after. Local Nazi leaders coordinated rallies to welcome the troops, singing military songs and Nazi anthems. In Berlin, at the Kroll Opera House, Hitler announced that Germany was no longer bound by the Locarno Pact because of her "interests of the basic rights of its people to the security of their frontier"; the members of the Reichstag rejoiced in an ocean of "Heil! Heil! Heil!", believing that German honor, through the restoration of sovereignty, had been restored. Behind Hitler's façade of confidence, however, was a great gamble. The French Army was considered one of the finest armies in the world, and Britain could land five divisions of men within weeks. The German occupation troops at Rhineland, on the other hand, were young and inexperienced soldiers. German generals such as Werner von Blomberg, Werner von Fritsch, and Ludwig Beck, who all voiced against the re-militarization before Hitler overrode their recommendations, were convinced that should the French decide to take action with their overwhelming quantity of infantry with the support of the "finest artillery in the world", the Nazi government would fall within a week. Alfred Jodl admitted during the post-WW2 Nuremberg trials that he thought "the French covering army could have blown us to pieces". But Hitler intuition proved to be correct, and the gamble paid off. Britain stood and watched. France had a faint notion to uphold their Locarno Pact responsibilities, spearheaded by General Maurice Gamelin who noted that if France wished to take action, it had to be now and the campaign had to be fast, otherwise Germany's superior industrial capacities might tip the tide of the war after a few years. France sink under the sea of indecisiveness.
ww2dbaseIn Britain, the appeasement policy continued to reign, despite powerful speeches delivered by the likes of Winston Churchill.
ww2dbaseLord Lothian noted in London that "after all, [the Germans] are only going into their own back garden." To Churchill's dismay, the popular sentiment in Britain at this time was that Germany must be given its full sovereignty and dignity; with their honor restored, a general disarmament then would take place. Hitler, however, had no such notion in mind.
ww2dbaseSource: the Last Lion.
Last Major Update: Jul 2006
Photographs
Re-militarization of Rhineland Timeline
2 Mar 1936 | Werner von Blomberg issued orders for the reoccupation of Rhineland in western Germany. |
7 Mar 1936 | Upon the success of the Rhineland reoccupation in western Germany, Adolf Hitler dissolved the Reichstag and called for re-elections, which saw overwhelming approval for the action. |
Did you enjoy this article or find this article helpful? If so, please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Share this article with your friends: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
11 May 2009 05:18:31 PM
If we really had a United Nations what a Military force it would be, the whole world against a aggressive nation, what nation would even think about it.
4 Sep 2009 10:15:33 PM
If you look into history you'll find that most countries don't react until it's directly affecting their own well-being, causing a delayed offensive to whatever problem there might be. Honestly, it make sense look at the human psyche. We are constantly making decisions based solely on our circumstances at hand. Rarely do the masses prepare/react to the unexpected until it's too late. It's quite scary to think that this could happen again. What if happened in your country? Could you do anything about it? Probably not. The people will never know what's truly happening until their government fully allows it. There will never be a true democracy.
8 Mar 2010 10:41:09 AM
Sadly, the only time the Allies could stop Hitler without the risk of war.....and we missed it.
7 May 2010 07:52:31 AM
Trapper Brown is right
11 May 2011 08:21:34 AM
Awesome(:
22 Feb 2013 06:27:40 AM
great info, thanks!
5 Oct 2014 03:35:36 AM
I think that the occupation of the Rhine is one of the most important signs of Hitler's ready to start a new war ....
8 Jan 2017 10:07:48 AM
great thanks so much really useful
30 Aug 2020 07:32:44 AM
In my opinion, this date is crucial before the Second World War! The signatories and guarantors of the Versailles Peace Treaty of 1919 and the Locarno Treaty of 1925: France and Great Britain, ie their statesmen, the controversial King Edward VIII, Hitler's sympathizer, indecisive Prime Minister Stanley Baldwine, in France Albert Lebrun, President and Albert Sarraut, Prime Minister, they must sent a sharp protest note to Hitler and they did not. Alfred Jodl admitted during the trial in Nuremberg after the Second World War that he thought that "the French army that covered us could blow us to pieces". But Hitler's intuition proved right, and gambling paid off. Britain stood and watched. The failure of the then French and British politicians was soon paid for by the world with the Second World War! The fact that they did not fulfill their obligations was later bloodily paid for by the world!
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
» Mölders, Werner
Location:
» Germany
- » 1,150 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 43,889 timeline entries
- » 1,241 ships
- » 349 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 372 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 259 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,512 photos
- » 432 maps
Thomas Dodd, late 1945
Please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 a month will go a long way. Thank you!
Or, please support us by purchasing some WW2DB merchandise at TeeSpring, Thank you!
16 Feb 2009 04:10:19 PM
If the French had crossed into Germany, I think WW2 would have ended, before it started, got rid of hitler and the nazi's. If only, If only. Do nations have their heads buried in the sand,even today and let one or two nations carry the torch?