
Historical Information | |||||
Caption | German Tiger I heavy tank crew resting, Tunisia, early 1943 ww2dbase | ||||
Date | 1943 | ||||
Photographer | Appe [Arppe] | ||||
Source Information | |||||
Source | ww2dbaseGerman Federal Archives | ||||
Identification Code | Bild 101I-562-1164-26A | ||||
Related Content | |||||
More on... |
| ||||
Licensing Information | |||||
Licensing | Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Germany License (CC BY-SA 3.0 DE).
See Bild 101I-562-1164-26A on Wikimedia Commons According to the German Federal Archive (Bundesarchiv), as of 21 Jul 2010, photographs can be reproduced with if these preconditions are met: - add the signature of the pictures and - of name of the originator, i.e. the photographer. ... You also can use fotos from the Federal Archives for free on Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bundesarchiv Please contact us regarding any inaccuracies with the above information. Thank you. |
||||
Metadata | |||||
Added By | C. Peter Chen | ||||
Photo Size | 800 x 571 pixels |
Please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Please help us spread the word: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
2.
Bill says:
8 Feb 2011 11:47:40 AM
What does sPzAbt.501 mean? schwere Panzer Abteilung. Heavy Armor Division/Section

8 Feb 2011 11:47:40 AM
What does sPzAbt.501 mean? schwere Panzer Abteilung. Heavy Armor Division/Section
3.
Bill says:
13 Feb 2011 06:45:33 PM
Photo of Tiger 732 at the Roman site of
El Djem, Tunis February 1943.
The Tiger was assigned to 7. Kompanie Panzer-Regiment, 1Oth Panzer Division.
Former 1.Kompanie sPz.Abt.501

13 Feb 2011 06:45:33 PM
Photo of Tiger 732 at the Roman site of
El Djem, Tunis February 1943.
The Tiger was assigned to 7. Kompanie Panzer-Regiment, 1Oth Panzer Division.
Former 1.Kompanie sPz.Abt.501
4. David Byrden says:
27 Jan 2013 10:23:13 AM
Well spotted, Bill, but I disagree on one point. Tigers were not yet renumbered in the 700s by the end of February. Also, the actions in February were to the west of El Djem.
I think this is 18 March 1943, when PR 7 was marching from Tunis to Maknassy.
27 Jan 2013 10:23:13 AM
Well spotted, Bill, but I disagree on one point. Tigers were not yet renumbered in the 700s by the end of February. Also, the actions in February were to the west of El Djem.
I think this is 18 March 1943, when PR 7 was marching from Tunis to Maknassy.
5.
Bill says:
24 Mar 2013 05:16:55 PM
Thanks for your comment this is what historical inforation I have.
Look at the photograph the Tiger's turret number is number 732 photo could have been taken before or after the time line you stated.
There will always be more than one view of a wartime photograph.
BY THE NUMBERS:
Let's take a look at Tiger number 732 in above photograph. What does that turret number mean
7th Company, 3rd Platoon, 2nd Tank.
Battalion Level Command & Recon tanks had 2 numbers (I.e. 03) Regimental HQ & Recon also had 2 nunbers, but had an (R) as well (I.e. R04) as the war continued, so did the turret numbers hope this helps you out...

24 Mar 2013 05:16:55 PM
Thanks for your comment this is what historical inforation I have.
Look at the photograph the Tiger's turret number is number 732 photo could have been taken before or after the time line you stated.
There will always be more than one view of a wartime photograph.
BY THE NUMBERS:
Let's take a look at Tiger number 732 in above photograph. What does that turret number mean
7th Company, 3rd Platoon, 2nd Tank.
Battalion Level Command & Recon tanks had 2 numbers (I.e. 03) Regimental HQ & Recon also had 2 nunbers, but had an (R) as well (I.e. R04) as the war continued, so did the turret numbers hope this helps you out...
6. David Byrden says:
8 Jan 2016 02:24:09 AM
>> "photo could have been taken before or after the time line you stated."
If you look at the other photos taken at the same time (on the same negative strip at the Bundesarchiv, with the same local people in them) it becomes clear that we're in El Jem.
Then, if you look at the movements of PR7 in 1943, you will find that 18 March 1943 is the only time they could have been in El Jem heading south. And all the Tigers in these photos are travelling south. So that's how I deduced the date.
8 Jan 2016 02:24:09 AM
>> "photo could have been taken before or after the time line you stated."
If you look at the other photos taken at the same time (on the same negative strip at the Bundesarchiv, with the same local people in them) it becomes clear that we're in El Jem.
Then, if you look at the movements of PR7 in 1943, you will find that 18 March 1943 is the only time they could have been in El Jem heading south. And all the Tigers in these photos are travelling south. So that's how I deduced the date.
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
Search WW2DB

News
- » US State Lawmaker John Winter Caught Using Racial Slur "Jap" and Apologized (11 Jun 2025)
- » Köln/Cologne Evacuated After Discovery of WW2 Bombs (4 Jun 2025)
- » US Women's Army Corps "Six Triple Eight" Awarded with Congressional Gold Medal (30 Apr 2025)
- » Race, Holocaust, and African-American WW2 Histories Removed from the US Naval Academy Library (7 Apr 2025)
- » US Government Plans to Purge WW2 Information (17 Mar 2025)
- » See all news
Current Site Statistics
- » 1,176 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 44,933 timeline entries
- » 1,245 ships
- » 350 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 376 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 261 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,468 photos
- » 365 maps
Famous WW2 Quote
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few."Winston Churchill, on the RAF
Support Us

Please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 a month will go a long way. Thank you!

Or, please support us by purchasing some WW2DB merchandise at TeeSpring, Thank you!
7 Feb 2011 05:50:06 PM
Photograph of Tiger # 732, of Schwere Panzer
Abteilung 501, still drawing in the locals.
Say are those tankers, playing chess?, if so
let's take a look, let's see who's winning...
QUEEN TAKES PAWN...
Queen takes pawn. Bishop takes Knight's pawn
Rook to King One, Queen to Bishop Six, Bishop takes pawn, Knight takes Bishop..Looks
like you're right...
This is not a fictional Chess Game, moves are
based on Roesch vs. Schlage, Chess Match held
in Hamburg, Germany in 1910.
After watching 2001: A Space Odyssey in 1968 I became interested in the game, I do play a fair game of chess myself.