Lincoln Spire to Honour RAF Bomber Command
Contributor: Alan Chanter
A 100ft-tall steel spire is due to be erected on the site on top of Canwick Hill, Lincolnshire, England, United Kingdom by June 9, in time for the nearby city of Lincoln's Magna Carta celebrations. Its height is the equivalent of a Lancaster bomber's wingspan. The two-metre high walls that will surround the spire are also due for completion by June. They will bear the names of 25,611 wartime servicemen from Lincolnshire bases who died for our freedom. The spire is being made in sections in Yorkshire and is due to be brought to Lincoln on three low loader lorries on May 10 and will be officially unveiled on October 2. The completed £8 million Bomber Command Centre is due to open next year.
For more information:
ITV: First glimpse of Lincoln spire built to honour Bomber Command
International Bomber Command Centre Website
Back to Main | Back to 2015 News Index
Did you enjoy this article or find this article helpful? If so, please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Share this article with your friends: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
- » Wreck of USS Edsall Found (14 Nov 2024)
- » Autumn 2024 Fundraiser (7 Nov 2024)
- » Nobel Peace Prize for the Atomic Bomb Survivors Organization (11 Oct 2024)
- » Wreck of USS Stewart/DD-224 Found (2 Oct 2024)
- » See all news
- » 1,150 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 43,917 timeline entries
- » 1,241 ships
- » 350 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 375 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 260 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,550 photos
- » 432 maps
Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, 16 Mar 1945
Please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 a month will go a long way. Thank you!
Or, please support us by purchasing some WW2DB merchandise at TeeSpring, Thank you!
4 May 2015 08:55:41 PM
The Lancaster wingspan was at least 102 feet, not 100'.
Why the error?
British historians are far better than this.